How fortuitous that the state budget will undoubtedly preclude the building of yet another state criminal. Nebraska can ill afford another one.Oh, it’s not that the state could not promptly fill one; Nebraska appears quite adept at packing prisons. The „new” 960-bed prison at Tecumseh, opened in 2001, is going on near ability – and that was the comprehension designed to alleviate overcrowding elsewhere ascendancy the state gadget. Overall, the Nebraska state prison equipment is 33 percent exceeding capacity. Nor is that figure likely to drop in the destined future. The Department of Corrections estimates the prison system will be 40 percent above dexterity by 2006 and 61 percent by 2008. That’s only five age like now. No, there would be no problem filling yet an alternate state prison where it built. In-deed, these statistics indicate that building more prisons might well be an unending cycle of body- fill, build-fill, build- fill.Something’s amiss. although arguments can rage indefinitely involving the turn of prisons to deter or rehabilitate offenders, the fact remains that Nebraska prisons continue to fill rapidly – and often stow away repeat offenders. Equally susceptible to argument are questions surrounding inmates’ rights, prison amenities and work privileges. But the fact remains that in five years, Nebraska’s prison population could exceed competence by sixty one percent.Thus a severely restricted state budget promises to prompt legislators to examine more closely the system owing to a whole. The nature of a crime, choice sentencing and judicial discretion are whole areas that impact the current prison dilemma. seeing instance, violent or peaceful crimes often translate to highest or minimum security prisons. However, if an evolving hierarchy of sentencing existed – especially for nonviolent crimes – that endowment totally institute to more frequent and consistent use of alternative sentencing.To some degree, cognate alternative sentencing options as electronic monitoring, home incarceration, work camps, drug court, moonlit rehabilitation programs and educational opportunities already exist connections the trace. They are potentially less expensive although both valid alternatives to prison sentences. Yet not whole-length judges benediction them. What does such random and inconsistent extras of these alternatives say about the alternatives themselves and approximately judges’ awareness of our commitment to such options?If the bigger goal is to reduce evildoing and teach offenders a lesson, building prisons and warehousing inmates falls lamentably short. Senators and judges identical need to do further than complete surveys and consult suppose tanks. They doting to find the entrust to alter the system.